All-rounder: An Expectation
Who is an all-rounder? The one who contributes in all the
departments of the game? Yes, majority will agree with the fact that the one
who can ball, bat and contribute in the field is an all rounder, but did anyone
ever think of the pressure that an all-rounder carries in his shoulder?
If I talk about the history of
all-rounder in the gentlemen’s game a few names that will come into my mind are
Jacques Kallis, Kapil Dev,Imraan Khan, Andrew Flintoff, Steve Waugh, Lance
Klusner, Shane Watson etc. They had the ability to change the game at their own
will no matter whether with the bat or with the ball. In present days Sakib, Faulkner, Ben Stokes, Dwayne Bravo etc
are those whom a team can bank at any given time.
India too had a list of good
all-rounder, Saurav Ganguly, Robin Singh, Manoj Prabhakar will always be
remembered for their all round abilities but what is the reason that India
could not sustain an all rounder for a longer period of time? Is over
experimentation a cause for that?
The expectation that an all-rounder
carries is much higher than an opening batsmen or an opening bowler because an
all-rounder will come into play when either a fielding side needs a wicket or a
chasing team will be looking to build a big partnership or look at finishing a
match.
The name Irfan Pathan will always
come into every Indian’s mind when we talk about over experimentation and try
to forcefully create an all rounder out of nowhere, Pathan in those days was
emerging as a good bowler who also loved batting, but didn’t India commit a
blunder by experimenting him in the top order position with the bat which also
affected his bowling and fitness in the later part of his career? Wasn’t a
bright career flawed just because of an unwanted trial to counterpart the
overseas expert? Is present team India doing the same with Hardik Pandya?
In my opinion an all-rounder
should focus only in one particular area and contribute in the other as and
when a team requires. I am taking about batsmen who can ball or a bowler who
can bat but experimenting with the batting order and the bowling line up might
give a negative result for the team in future and moreover this might be a
career breaking decision for the player himself. If you see at some of the
examples I mentioned from overseas you can figure out that those players did
not experiment much with their batting order and as a result they contributed for a much longer period for
their nation and I feel somewhere down the line India should learn from the
overseas examples and also their previous mistakes and try to stick to a
particular process.
Great. Keep writing.
ReplyDelete